[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:



On Sun, 22 Mar 1998 18:00:40 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>Hi Kathy,
>
>>Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>Terry looking at this without taking sides though, wouldn't you agree
>>she has a better chance of suing her ex and penthouse for the
>>unauthorized pictures of her in a public magazine?
>
>She wouldn't have a ghost of a chance against "Penthouse."  It would 
>be a
>quixotic effort.  It's extremely unlikely that she would succeed even
>against her husband.  All such efforts have failed.
>
>Think of the pictures of Jaqueline Kennedy, of the videos of Pamela 
>Lee.
>Even think of the star of "Deep Throat," who claims she was an 
>unwilling
>participant in such films.  
>
>>I can see her winning
>>that law suit easily. I know I would be doing that if it was me.
>
>You would lose almost certainly.  And imagine the fun you would have
>testifying to how it had affected your sex life. :-{
>Best,     Terry 
>
HI Terry and Kathy,

You missed the obvious.  Paula Jones couldn't afford to sue her ex or
Penthouse.  Actually, suing her ex does not make sense because he doesn't
have the deep pockets.

But the Rutherford Institute and other right wing groups would not
support her financially to sue her ex and Penthouse.  But they DID
support her financially to sue Clinton.  

Bill


_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to