Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


-=Today's Puzzle:
 
 Outre Ornaments, Inc. sells baubles, gewgaws, and trinkets;
 while there I spoke to three different salespeople.
 
 1) The first salesperson I talked to told me any 7 baubles
    together with any 5 gewgaws have the same value as any
    6 trinkets.
 2) The second salesperson I talked to told me any 4 baubles
    together with any 9 trinkets have the same value as any
    5 gewgaws.
 3) The third salesperson I talked to told me any 6 trinkets
    together with any 3 gewgaws have the same value as any
    4 baubles.
 4) When I bought some of each kind of ornament I found out
    exactly one of these salespersons was wrong.
 
 Which salesperson was wrong?*
 
 -=Yesterday's Answer:
 
 Tees And Els - Case I. If Annette's statement is true, all
 three cannot be members of the Tee family and Cynthia cannot
 be the only one of the three who is a member of the El family.
 So, if Annette's statement is true, either: Annette is the
 only one of the three who is a member of the Tee family or
 Bernice is the only one of the three who is a member of the
 El family.
 Case II. Of Annette's statement is false, Annette cannot be
 the only one of the three who is a member of the El family
 and Bernice cannot be the only one of the three who is a
 member of the Tee family. So if Annette's statement is false,
 either: Cynthia is the only one of the three who is a member
 of the Tee family or all three are members of the El family.
 Then: Annette is a member of the Tee family in Case I and
 Annette is a member of the El family in Case II. Bernice is
 a member of the El family in Case I and Bernice is a member
 of the El family in Case II. Cynthia may be a member of either
 family in Case I and Cynthia may be a member of either family
 in Case II. So you know only the name of Bernice's family (El).
 
-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to