Steve Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >Hi Steve: > >OK that makes sense, in a way. But if we are not allowed to even talk >to them what are they going to debrief us about? Who know, it beats me but I suppose I must be a believer, I don't know if thats the right term or anything. > >How can something be illegal if it doesn't exist? Thats exactly it, I have also found out today that your fire departments have a bit in there operations manual, about what should be done in the event of a UFO landing, quardon the area etc. So there's two laws made, about something which doesn't exist, I wonder how many more there are......... Could someone please check this for me. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------- If so what is it? Or did you mean they are classifying these articles as Top Secret. Now there are different classifications of Top secret on access, I.e. "for White eyes only" "For Blue eyes" and so on. There are two classifications that I have heard of but I must stress that I have found no evidence of there existence. These are: Ultra - Used by NATO - the highest rating there is used for documents which are on a One copy of One basis. Cosmic - NATO/UN - used for matters of utmost importance, including spy satellites anything in space really. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- Techno Speak - I have noticed that a great many replies to questions of UFO sighting by reliable witness (airline pilots) have resulted in a rather queer term. "We have investigated the matter and found that the sighting was of no defense significance". So a unidentified aircraft flying over a military base is of no defense significance, does that mean that they know what it actually was????? and know it was not a threat. Cheers All Spooky Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
