Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
She can't be forced to testify against him in a criminal trial, I don't
think the same applies in a civil trial. Also that law is not enforce in
all states anymore about testifying against a spouse.
If he tries to claim executive privilege he can say good-bye to an sort
of public life after his presidency is over, and possibly to the
presidency its self, it's political suicide to claim EP. Also there is
no way that Hillary should qualify under this at all.
Sue Hartigan wrote:
>
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I have a question about this that perhaps someone on here can
> answer..Why would Hillary need executive privilege, she cannot be forced
> to testify against her husband.
>
> Sue
>
> WASHINGTON (AP) -- Legal scholars voiced skepticism and critics
> saw Nixonian abuses Tuesday in the White House effort to use
> executive privilege to shield aides from questions about conversations
> with Hillary Rodham Clinton.
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
