Re: L&I Re: Is a Fetus a Person? /example/Ron/Sue

[Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D.]

"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Thanks for this post Ron, it will be very helpful in looking back at
'People v. Ward,' and the California statute on rights of the unborn.
especially the distinction between neonate, infant and child. Glad u r
back! :) LDMF.
---------------------------Ronald Helm wrote:--------------------------
> when would a
> >fetus be a "child"? (At same time as it/she/he would be a [viable]
> >person?).  :) LDMF.
> 
> A fetus would never be classified as a child ( except by the anti-choice
> people who accuse me of being a child killer ) as a fetus only exists in the
> uterus, once it is born the following definitions apply.
> 
> A neonate for the first 28 days after birth, a n infant until 1 year of age,
> a child after one year of age.  Those are medical definitions, mainly for
> keeping track of infant and neonatal mortality rates, but in general quite
> adequate and accepted by the legal profession as well as the medical
> profession.  Ron
> 
> Women have their faults. Men have only two.
> Everything they say. Everything they do.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues