[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Kathy,
The number of coincidences that one has to swallow to believe Judy Buenoano
was innocent are mind-boggling no doubt. When she argued she had to prove
her innocence it was hardly far from the mark. One of the great bete-noires
of the Simpson case surfaced in this case again: Roger Martz. The FBI is
still looking diligently for evidence of his work on the case and the courts
are still open to argument while they are shoveling dirt in her face.
I was really just disputing that Buenoano was executed without much uproar
because she was not young and pretty. People are not overly anxious to see
a kindly dignified old lady who teaches Bible classes killed. Her lawyers
concentrated on the evidence, such as it was, and thus there were no appeals
from Pope John Paul and Pat Robertson and people around the world.
>Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Terry :)
>
>Well she won't be confessing since they executed her this morning. Yet I
>did see "The New Detectives" profile her bombing case and I was
>convinced by the evidence that she did it. I am just surprised how
>silent people were about this case. Both her and Tucker claimed to have
>found God, both of them taught religion in prison, yet no one was
>interested in taking up her cause. Now her son dying the same day he's
>released to her, well it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that
>one out LOL and I personally thought the DA who prosecuted her needed a
>bit more of a imagination, it seems they always call female killers
>"Black Widows", it gets rather boring hearing the same phrase when
>talking about female killers.
>
>The Supreme Court denied her appeal last week.
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> No, Kathy, she needs a name everyone can remember and pronounce. People
>> don't love black widows. She needs to confess and stress her religious
>> conversion and that she teaches Bible classes. She must not talk about
>> evidence or innocence. Who wants to hear that dry stuff? Certainly not
>> courts. They are supposedly still examining the evidence according to her
>> lawyer.
>>
>> A lawyer needs PR skills. Forget the evidence. That is immaterial.
>>
>> It takes a great leap of faith to believe all the incredible coincidences.
>> But who cares about that stuff?
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
