[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Oh Terry'
>
>The case of the college student with a tape recorder is not even parallel to
>the material Judge Wright had to go by. She didn't have a tape recording, so
>could only go by allegations that were not supported in the documents submitted
>to the court. The courts are clogged enough without putting cases on the
>docket that do not measure up to the standards of the court.
Oh Jackie,
Judge Wright decided such things were not sexual harassment. She did not
decide on the merits of the evidence regarding Jones' description of
Clinton's conduct.
Judge Wright decided much more flagrant behaviour by Clinton as presumed
true by the requirements of the summary judgment was not "outrageous"
If the representative had had the same ruling he would have not had to face
removal from office and criminal prosecution. If he had the same supporters
Clinton has his approval would have soared and he might have planned a
bright future.
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
