Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


SAN QUENTIN, Calif. (AP) -- Unkempt, unwashed, unable to do
much more than mumble ``word salads,'' death row inmate Horace Kelly
is so out of touch, his lawyers say, he thinks he's already been
executed
eight times.

Kelly is scheduled to die April 14, unless lawyers making a last-ditch
effort to spare him can convince jurors that he's insane. A sanity
hearing
looks to the mind of a murderer for the answer to a question that hasn't
been raised in California for 47 years: What happens if a condemned
prisoner goes mad?

The hearing was to begin today.

``The question is not whether or not you're psychotic. There's a lot of
psychotic people on death row. The question is whether or not you're so
far gone that you don't understand the nature and effect of the death
penalty and why you're getting it,'' said Michael Radelet, chairman of
the
University of Florida's sociology department and author of the 1993
book ``Executing the Mentally Ill.''

Radelet, who recently visited Kelly, said it's obvious he should be
spared
under state and federal law prohibiting the execution of the insane.

Not everyone is convinced.

``He's not being executed for who he is. He's being executed for what he
did,'' Shannon Prock, who watched Kelly kill her young cousin, told The
Press-Enterprise in Riverside.

Kelly, 38, was sent to death row for murdering three people in a
seven-day rampage in November 1984. Two of his victims, Sonia Reed
and Ursula Houser, were found on San Bernardino streets, shot to death
and nude from the waist down.

The third victim was 11-year-old Danny Osentowski, Ms. Prock's
cousin.

Danny and 13-year-old Shannon, together for Thanksgiving Day, were
walking home from a corner store when Kelly grabbed Shannon at
gunpoint. Danny came to the rescue, kicking Kelly.

Shannon later testified that she heard a shot and then heard Danny say
``Don't shoot me again. I'll die this way.''

Kelly shot Danny point blank between the eyes.

In 1986, Kelly was sentenced to die for Danny's murder. A year later he
was found competent to stand trial for the murders of the two women,
for which he also received a death sentence.

The sanity hearing was prompted by a report from a prison psychiatrist.

State law requires prison officials to notify prosecutors if a condemned
man's sanity is in question. A jury of 12 must decide the matter.

California hasn't had such a case since 1951.

The defense contends that the statute in question, which is 100 years
old,
needs to be updated to conform with Supreme Court rulings.

But Marin County Superior Court Judge William McGivern ruled the law
could be interpreted to provide the protections the Supreme Court
requires, such as the defendant's right to attend and be represented by
a
lawyer. At least nine jurors must agree on a verdict; their decision
cannot
be appealed.

Prosecutors won't say if they'll try to prove Kelly is sane.

His lawyers say Kelly grew up in an abusive family, and sometimes ate
dog food, sat in a tree and howled when he was a young man; he
believed he had bionic ears.

Prison officials do not arrange interviews with death row inmates, but
Kelly's lawyers provided reports indicating a steady deterioration in
his
mental health.

A 1991 evaluation is blank except for this: ``This disturbed man cannot
respond to questions.'' Last month, when Kelly was visited by
psychiatrist Sophia Vinogradov, he was dirty, smelly and incoherent.

 Asked if he knew what crimes he was to be executed for, Kelly replied,
 `Under animal law book under public people it would be certified
people group or congregation.''

Richard Dieter of the Death Penalty Information Center said it's rare
for
an execution to be stopped because of insanity.

One of the best known cases is that of Gary Alvord, a mental hospital
escapee who strangled three women and was sent to Florida's death row
in 1974. He was judged incompetent 10 years later but later was
returned to death row.
-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to