Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


If you have plans to rob a bank or stick up a 7Eleven, best stick with
the formal wear -- slacks or corduroys -- and leave the blue jeans in
the closet. 

FBI scientists reported at the American Academy of Forensic Sciences in
February that they are using a new technique to identify criminals --
analyzing the unique wear patterns of denim jeans and comparing them to
photographs taken from crime scenes. 

Richard Vorder Bruegge, a scientist in the photographic unit at the
FBI's forensics lab, developed the technique during an investigation
into the bombings and bank robberies that occurred in Spokane,
Washington, during the spring and summer of 1996. 

At the trial, in June 1997, the criminals were convicted based in part
on the FBI's analysis of their jeans. Unlike hair and fiber analysis,
this technique involves no chemistry and is strictly a comparison
between photographs and the articles of clothing submitted as evidence.
Vorder Bruegge says it's the same sort of comparison a forensics
scientist would make to match a fingerprint or tire tread, looking for
unique patterns. 

When FBI field agents arrest suspects, they also have a search warrant
for their home and car. Vorder Bruegge said that in the Spokane case the
agency gathered hundreds of articles of clothing, including 27 pairs of
jeans, to look for traces of explosives. 

As you continually wash jeans, Vorder Bruegge says, the dye rubs off and
exposes the white cotton underneath. They fade in a unique pattern, he
says, because in their manufacture, the motion of pulling the jeans
through a machine causes inconsistent bumps along the seams. Primarily,
the FBI looks at the fading that results from these manufacturing      
inconsistencies. When the bureau analyzed the jeans in the Spokane case,
one pair matched more than two dozen features of the jeans in the crime
scene photograph. 

"The main reason we were able to make out these jeans in particular was
because the bank that was robbed used high quality 35mm cameras.
Unfortunately, most places today are using video cameras, which have
poorer resolution," Vorder Bruegge says. 

Jack King, Public Affairs Director at the National Association         
of Criminal Defense Lawyers (NACDL) is skeptical of the FBI's newfound
fashion sense. 

"Even with digitally enhanced photography, I have severe doubts about
this technique, and will continue to have severe doubts until it's
proven conclusively. It sounds like voodoo to me," he says. 

In the Spokane case, one of the gang was caught on film in April 1996.
He was wearing a mask, but part of his faded jeans was visible, and he
stood still long enough for the camera to get a clear picture. 

Although this was the first time the FBI was able to derive          
conclusive evidence from this type of seam fading, the bureau was able
to place another criminal at the scene of a crime based on a circular
pattern caused by a can of chewing tobacco repeatedly stored in one
suspect's back pocket. 

At the Spokane trial, a used-jeans exporter was an expert witness for
the defense, and he claimed the patterns were common to all jeans. From
a total of 400 pairs of jeans, he showed the court 34 similar pairs, but
in each case the FBI could distinguish them from the accused's. 

Still, the NACDL's King remains skeptical that photographic evidence is
clear enough to analyze something as subtle as jean wear patterns. 

"Photographic analysis is often very subjective," King says. "Unlike
fingerprints, even with a good camera at a good distance, the
photographs aren't necessarily that good. It's hard to make out
someone's face from a surveillance camera, let alone a pattern in
jeans." 
--
Kathy E
"I can only please one person a day, today is NOT your day, and tomorrow
isn't looking too good for you either"
http://members.delphi.com/kathylaw/ Law & Issues Mailing List
http://pw1.netcom.com/~kathye/rodeo.html - Cowboy Histories
http://www.geocities.com/CapitolHill/Lobby/2990/law.htm Crime photo's

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to