[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I don't think Starr is affected by ANY statutes. :)
Bill
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:07:33 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>Bailey didn't have Starr after his butt either. :)
>
>Isn't there a statute of limitations on cases like this. That
>Whitewater thing happened 25 or so years ago.
>
>Sue
>>
>> HI Sue,
>>
>> Yeah, that was an ironic bit of timing, wasn't it? And I guess we
>> shouldn't minimize the fact that she and her husband DID commit
>crimes
>> and stole money from others. But I wouldn't have a problem with
>crediting
>> her for timed served on the contempt charge. I've never heard of
>anyone
>> held that long for contempt of court. Even Flea Bailey didn't get
>that
>> kind of treatment.
>>
>> Bill
>
>--
>Two rules in life:
>
>1. Don't tell people everything you know.
>2.
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
