Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


April 10, 1998
 
           Experts Deny Iraq Has Ended Its Germ Warfare Program

>           [U] NITED NATIONS -- A team of independent experts who
>               reviewed Iraq's progress in eliminating biological
>           weapons at Baghdad's request has rejected President
>           Saddam Hussein's contention that he no longer has a
>           germ warfare program.
> 
>           The experts' report, released on Thursday, called Iraqi
>           disclosures "incomplete and inadequate" and said
>           Baghdad had failed to convince them that biological
>           weapons or the ingredients to make them have been
>           eliminated.
> 
>           Most disturbing, the report said, were Iraqi claims
>           that missile warheads containing biological weapons had
>           been destroyed. The Iraqi account, "cannot be
>           reconciled with physical evidence," said the report,
>           compiled by military and scientific experts from 13
>           countries, including the United States, Russia, China
>           and France.
> 
>           The findings are a blow to Iraq, which had demanded the
>           independent review in the hope that it would present a
>           more positive picture of Iraqi compliance than the
>           report by the U.N. Special Commission, the team of arms
>           inspectors that was charged with eliminating Iraq's
>           weapons of mass destruction after the end of the war in
>           the Persian Gulf in 1991.
> 
>           U.N. inspectors believe that Baghdad could still have
>           an active germ warfare program or the ingredients to
>           quickly produce extremely lethal biological weapons.
> 
>           The United Nations had agreed to Iraqi demands for an
>           independent review, to be conducted with Iraqi experts
>           present, and invited member countries to nominate
>           experts for the independent panel. But in this case, as
>           in other recent reviews, experts from countries
>           friendly to Iraq have instead agreed with the findings
>           of other experts from neutral and more critical
>           nations.
> 
>           Iraq and the Security Council are heading into another
>           crucial and potentially explosive few weeks,
>           culminating in the first major review of sanctions
>           against Iraq since Secretary General Kofi Annan
>           concluded an agreement with Saddam in February that
>           headed off an American military attack.
> 
>           Iraqi officials have been talking confidently of
>           closing the book on sanctions this year. That will
>           certainly not happen in Security Council deliberations
>           this month, diplomats say.
> 
>           But diplomats and U.N. officials have not ruled out
>           some movement on easing sanctions by the fall, when the
>           next major reassessment by the council is to take
>           place.
> 
>           Russia, France and China, which all have potentially
>           large commercial interests in Iraq, have argued that
>           the embargo cannot last forever. Russian and French
>           officials, as well as Annan, have been telling Iraq
>           that it must cooperate with inspections to strengthen
>           its position.
> 
>           The recently completed U.N. inspections of eight
>           formerly off-limits presidential properties in Iraq,
>           made possible by Annan's agreement, are being touted by
>           the Iraqis as significant cooperation. A report on
>           those inspections will be sent to the Security Council
>           next week.
> 
>           But some serious questions remain about those
>           inspections, and these could add to Iraq's problems in
>           coming weeks. When Annan signed the pact with Iraq on
>           Feb. 23, Iraqi officials suggested that they regarded
>           the presidential site inspections as one-time events.
> 
>           Annan and Richard Butler, the executive chairman of the
>           Special Commission, have argued that there were no such
>           restrictions on access. U.N. inspectors treated the
>           visits to the sites as preliminary inspections and
>           anticipated follow-up visits, with less fanfare and
>           less notice. If Iraq concludes otherwise, the stage
>           would be set for another tense confrontation.
> 
>           The independent report on biological weapons, sent to
>           the Security Council on Wednesday by Butler, was one of
>           four ordered in January, when Iraqi defiance of arms
>           inspections had reached a crisis. Experts on chemical
>           weapons and missiles reached similar conclusions. A
>           report by the International Atomic Energy Agency on the
>           Iraqi nuclear program is also expected to find
>           problems.
> 
>           A comprehensive account of where inspections stand on
>           all Iraqi weapons systems that must be eliminated
>           before sanctions can be lifted will also go to the
>           council next week.
> 
>           From the end of the Persian Gulf war in 1991 until
>           1995, Iraq had denied that it possessed biological
>           weapons. But in August of 1995 the defection to Jordan
>           of Saddam Hussein's son-in-law and former arms
>           minister, Hussein Kamel, led to the "discovery" of
>           damning documents the Iraqis said were found on the
>           defector's chicken farm.
> 
>           Since then, Iraq has said it has made several "full,
>           final and complete declarations" about the biological
>           program, the last in September 1997. Experts have never
>           found them credible.
> 
>           The independent report, compiled after a meeting of
>           Iraqi and foreign experts in Vienna from March 20 to
>           27, reaches the same conclusion. Moreover, the
>           independent experts appear to have sensed that Iraq did
>           not intend to allow the review to be too rigorous.
> 
>           The report says that the Iraqi side "did not include
>           within its technical team a full range of technical and
>           managerial expertise to enable most of the technical
>           issues to be fully examined."
> 
>           Iraqis also did not offer information on either the
>           current status of biological weapons programs or state
>           conclusively when such projects were terminated if they
>           no longer existed. Missing from Iraqi documentation was
>           information about the Al-Hazen Institute, a biological
>           and chemical research center belonging to one of Iraq's
>           numerous intelligence agencies. The Iraqis told the
>           foreign experts that the institute had been destroyed
>           because it was a failure.
> 
>           "Current information makes this assertion difficult to
>           accept," the report said.
> 
>           One of the few new pieces of information to emerge in
>           the meetings, the report noted, was that Iraq was
>           planning to spray the toxin that causes botulism from
>           airplanes. Earlier, the Iraqis had said that they had
>           planned to use anthrax bacteria.
> 
>           The report also said the Iraqis could not explain why
>           they had purchased viral, fungal and mycotoxin strains
>           -- all used in germ warfare. It also called the Iraqi
>           account of production of aflatoxins, another
>           biologoical agent, "implausible."


-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to