Steve Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm not sure really our Judges are way out of touch on most things but I
think that were just as bored and fed up with the two faced politicians as
your good selves. I doubt he would get treated any fairer, I think that
Clinton would be called (looking for a good English word here) a bounder
first and a typical lolly pop stealing politician second.
Any damages reward to the plaintiff would be a fragment of what would be
awarded in the U.S. So if she was just after fame & money shed only get the
former<g>.
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Ronald Helm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, April 13, 1998 8:02 PM
Subject: Re: L&I Will Jones appeal? Wont she? So what?
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>? All
>> this media coverage must be making it impossible for a fair case to be
>> heard. How do you find an impartial judge and jury?
>>
>> Steve>>
>
>Maybe Clinton could get a change of venue to England, where he is "very
much
>admired and respected". Do you think that the English would describe his
>alleged behavior as only "boorish and crude", but not outrageous? Ron
>
> 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name.
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
