Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Vi:
He already has one state that is putting that law about children not
having to live or be in the custody of murders on the books. I didn't
realize it but in almost every state a person can be convicted of
murdering their spouse and still retain custody of the children.
Sue
> Hi Sue,
>
> IMO this program on American justice is long overdue, and whether Fred
> Goldman comes across as doleful or happy is irrelevant. The public needs
> to be educated concerning the chicanery that goes on in a courtroom by
> high-priced lawyers in the name of "defense".
>
> Two years after the Simpson bloody double murder, with the killer able to
> buy his way out of paying for his crime, I am still meeting people who
> swallowed Cochran and Co's bull about cops planting blood and glove while
> ignoring completely the solid, scientific DNA evidence: that size 12,
> ugly-assed shoe print, blood on the bronco and Simpson's sox, the limo
> driver's testimony, hair fibers matching Simpson's, his cut finger and
> his contradictory stories of how he got the cut and where he was during
> the time of the murders!!! Incredible!!!
>
> If any writer came up with a script like this, no publisher would touch
> it.
>
> Vi
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
