Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Prosecutors Summon McDougal Again

>           LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- Prosecutors have again
>           summoned Susan McDougal before the Whitewater grand
>           jury, possibly setting up another showdown over her
>           refusal testify, her lawyer said Thursday.
> 
>           Prosecutors want Mrs. McDougal -- President Clinton's
>           Whitewater business partner -- to testify next week, 1
>           1/2 years after she refused to answer questions about
>           him before the panel, said her lawyer, Mark Geragos of
>           Los Angeles.
> 
>           Mrs. McDougal recently completed 18 months behind bars
>           on a civil contempt citation stemming from her refusal
>           to testify. She has begun serving a two-year federal
>           prison sentence for her 1996 bank fraud conviction.
> 
>           James McDougal, her late husband, had cooperated with
>           Whitewater prosecutor Kenneth Starr. Former Gov. Jim Guy
>           Tucker, who recently pleaded guilty to unrelated
>           charges, is cooperating with Starr to avoid prison.
> 
>           Geragos claimed summoning Mrs. McDougal was Starr's
>           response to a complaint Geragos lodged Tuesday. Geragos
>           asked a judge to bar the prosecutor from investigating
>           whether conservatives with whom Starr has ties funneled
>           money to David Hale, who testified against Mrs.
>           McDougal.
> 
>           ``It's my position that (Starr's) conflicted and he
>           can't do anything regarding Susan at this point,''
>           Geragos said. ``I will take steps to block her
>           appearance.''
> 
>           Also Thursday, a federal appeals court refused to block
>           Hale's trial on state charges. He is accused of lying to
>           regulators about an insurance company the state says he
>           owned.
> 
>           The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis
>           denied Hale's request to overturn a lower court's
>           dismissal of his lawsuit seeking a federal shield the
>           charges.
> 
>           Hale claimed that a plea agreement and immunity granted
>           him by federal Whitewater prosecutors should protect him
>           in a state case. Hale also argued that the state charge
>           was political payback for his cooperation with Starr.
> 
>           He is scheduled for trial April 22 in Pulaski County
>           Circuit Court.


-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to