"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Greetings - it does indeed look from here that showing detriment is Paula's big problem; wonder in the Now people are as interested in that as they are in the outrageous 'act'. Perhaps. Dr. Ron - didn't you post regarding feminist amicus curiae briefs? -----------------------Sue Hartigan wrote:----------------------------- > > Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Hi Dr. L.: > > I heard some people talking about this case the other night, and from > what I gathered this case would have a very big impact on the Paula > Jones case. It will also have a big impact on all sexual harassment > cases in the future. > > Sue > > > > So Sue, Group, would victory for Ellerth be very helpful to Paula Jones > > Appeal, where even if an Appeals court found the 'act' outrageous, there > > would still be for Jones the problem of showing detriment to her > > (damages)? > > -- > Two rules in life: > > 1. Don't tell people everything you know. > 2. > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Re: L&I Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D. Mon, 20 Apr 1998 12:50:09 -0400
- L&I Burlington Industries, Inc. v.... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Burlington Industries... Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D.
- Re: L&I Burlington Indust... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Burlington In... Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D.
- Re: L&I Burlington Industries... Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I Burlington Indust... Sue Hartigan
