"Linda D. Misek-Falkoff, Ph.D., J.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Greetings - it does indeed look from here that showing detriment is
Paula's big problem; wonder in the Now people are as interested in that
as they are in the outrageous 'act'.  Perhaps. Dr. Ron - didn't you post
regarding feminist amicus curiae briefs?

-----------------------Sue Hartigan wrote:-----------------------------
> 
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Hi Dr. L.:
> 
> I heard some people talking about this case the other night, and from
> what I gathered this case would have a very big impact on the Paula
> Jones case.  It will also have a big impact on all sexual harassment
> cases in the future.
> 
> Sue
> >
> > So Sue, Group, would victory for Ellerth be very helpful to Paula Jones
> > Appeal, where even if an Appeals court found the 'act' outrageous, there
> > would still be for Jones the problem of showing detriment to her
> > (damages)?
> 
> --
> Two rules in life:
> 
> 1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
> 2.
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues


Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to