Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc:
I agree. There has to be some kind of proof, *if* he destroyed them.
There was, or is tons and tons of that stuff and it would leave some
kind of record or something.
The palace that the inspectors just inspected was gutted. They had
cleaned everything out. It was too clean for the inspector's ideas.
I believe the weapons are hidden somewhere. He had months to do that.
And if we get out of there he will end up using them. I just don't
trust him one bit. Once a snake, always a snake. And they bite. (sorry
Kathy)
Sue
> Not exactly, Sody. Saddam says he disposed of the weapons -- a positive
> statement. We say, prove it. And you CAN prove a positive. Disposal of such
> a stash would almost inevitably leave records of one kind or another.
> Doc
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
