Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue
That that could be used as a precedent, couldn't it for insisting on a unanimous
decision?
jackief
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Jackie:
>
> Dr. L. is a lot more educated on the Supremes than I am, but since I
> have been reading these things I have seen quite a few that were
> unanimous in their findings to carry out the DP. In fact more than not.
>
> Sue
> > Hi Linda
> >
> > I would think that if we need a unanimous jury to convict on the death
> > penalty, it would follow that it would be nice if the appeals courts
> > followed that rule too. Of course, that would mean probably that all death
> > penalty appeals would result in no DP. What do you think?
> >
> > jackief
>
> --
> Two rules in life:
>
> 1. Don't tell people everything you know.
> 2.
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
