[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 20 Apr 1998 13:24:07 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
> There are women who are
>>REALLY abused in the work place and the Paula Jones of the world
>simply
>>make it that much more difficult for the real victims.
>>
>>Bill
>
>
>Bill: This is not about the degree of abuse that Paula Jones
>allegedly
>suffered, but about the fact that "Clinton's behavior" would or would
>not be
>considered outrageous for any other employer/employee interaction.
>Ron
HI Ron,
Apparently with respect to Arkansas law, the alleged behavior, if it
indeed happened, would not meet the threshold of being "outrageous".
But, as I understand it, even if it DID meet the threshold of being
outrageous, there still needs to be evidence of harm, damage or some
retribution by the employer towards the employee who rebuffed the
advances.
It will be interesting to see how the Supreme Court rules on the similar
case that they are currently reviewing.
The biggest problem for Paula Jones is her own lack of credibility and
the people she has become associated with who are calling all the shots.
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
