Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Terry:
I thought that she had already been convicted on the embezzlement thing
and that she was serving her sentence right now. In fact they had to go
get her out of prison today to take her to the grand jury thing. She
has been released from jail for the Starr thing. In fact she was
released the same day her ex died.
Am I wrong here?
Sue
> Hi Sue,
>
> Does the last give you any hint why Susan McDougal might not want to testify
> before the grand jury besides her fantastic claim she will prosecuted for
> telling the truth?
>
> Susan is awaiting trial on an embezzlement charge.
>
> I agree with you she has been caught between big boys playing mean and
> dirty. It is illegal but common to torture recalcitrant witnesses who may
> even fear for their lives or that of family if they testify. The law says
> they must be released when it becomes obvious they will not submit to
> pressure. Obviously Susan has shown she never will (read can). But it is
> Clinton who holds the aces rather than Starr.
>
> Best, Terry
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
