Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill
I know you are right, but you would think they would realize that in
reality it does affect them.
jackief
William J. Foristal wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
> Hi Jackie.
>
> Could it be because the people who HAVE the money also have the power?
> And that they fail to see how society is hurt by the inequities in the
> system because they don't think it will ever affect them?
>
> Bill
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 1998 05:09:39 -0600 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
> >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >
> >Hi Bill
> >
> >Darn it--no answer (teehee). I just think that in the attempt at
> >reform in
> >the cj system, we are going to end up with some real thorny problems.
> >Seems
> >to me that they just are not doing a "functional analysis" of these
> >proposed
> >policy changes.
> >
> >jackief
> >
> >William J. Foristal wrote:
> >
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
> >>
> >> Hi Jackie,
> >>
> >> Yeah, and that becomes a separate issue. Most of the laws regarding
> >the
> >> admissability of evidence are flexible enough so that it depends on
> >the
> >> judge's ruling. And it makes sense that a highly skilled attorney
> >will
> >> be able to make a more compelling argument in court as opposed to a
> >less
> >> skilled attorney. So the defendant who has the most money has the
> >best
> >> chance on winning these kind of issues. But I don't think laws can
> >be
> >> written to be so rigid that the judge does not have the opportunity
> >to
> >> consider the specifics of a case and rule accordingly.
> >>
> >> In summary, I don't have an answer to how to solve the problem. :)
> >>
> >> Bill
> >>
> >> On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 03:22:57 -0600 Jackie Fellows
> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> writes:
> >> >Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hi Bill
> >> >
> >> >I am getting a little apprehensive about some of the recent rulings
> >of
> >> >courts. It seems with our reactive type laws and policies, we
> >forget
> >> >the
> >> >middle ground and swing from one side of the pendulum to the other.
> >> >And, of
> >> >course, there are some that will have the money again to fight any
> >of
> >> >these
> >> >rulings so it just seems to increase the inequality in how justice
> >is
> >> >distributed.
> >> >
> >> >jackief
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >_____________________________________________________________________
> >> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> >> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> >> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
> >>
> >> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >In the sociology room the children learn
> >that even dreams are colored by your perspective
> >
> >I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
> >
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
--
In the sociology room the children learn
that even dreams are colored by your perspective
I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
