[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Sat, 25 Apr 1998 14:35:27 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>> Gracen believes the heavy media coverage of Clinton's
>alleged
>>affair with
>> a White House intern and the lengthy investigation into his
>>past are
>> ``embarrassing for America.''
>
>I don't think an investigation of anything is "embarrassing for
>America".
>The only thing that is embarrassing for America is Clinton's "patterns
>of
>behavior". I don't even think William Foristal would consider the
>investigation embarrassing for America, maybe potentially embarrassing
>for
>Clinton, Bill?
HI Ron,
If there is credible and reasonable evidence to suggest that a president
may have broken the law, then I think it is imperative that an
independent investigation be conducted. Rather than embarrassing America
I think it's a sign that the system works and no one is above the law.
I DO think that people who bring false charges against anyone and that
prosecutors who use their position to wage a poltiical battle that is
more concerned with falsely convicting someone rather than engaging in a
bona fide investigation should be the ones who are embarrassed.
But how can a nation that has such a large percentage of its citizens
watching shows like Jerry Springer really be embarrassed by the Starr
investigation? :)
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
