Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Supreme Court Rejects Hale Request

> 
>           LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- The U.S. Supreme Court today
>           rejected an effort by Whitewater figure David Hale to
>           stop a state trial he says is political payback for his
>           cooperation with Whitewater prosecutors.
> 
>           In a one-sentence order, the full court echoed Justice
>           Clarence Thomas, who last Tuesday also denied Hale's
>           request to delay the trial in Pulaski County Circuit
>           Court. After Thomas' decision, Hale's lawyers had
>           resubmitted the request to Justice David H. Souter, who
>           then referred it to the full court.
> 
>           Hale, 56, is charged with lying to insurance regulators
>           about the solvency of the burial insurance company the
>           state says he owned.
> 
>           The trial began Wednesday but was delayed after Hale
>           checked himself into a hospital the next day -- an hour
>           before opening statements were scheduled -- complaining
>           of chest pain and other problems. The trial is due to
>           resume Thursday after medical tests.
> 
>           Defense lawyer David Bowden had argued unsuccessfully
>           that immunity granted in a plea agreement with federal
>           Whitewater prosecutors should have shielded Hale from
>           state prosecution.
> 
>           In 1994, Hale pleaded guilty to two federal felony
>           fraud counts and agreed to cooperate in the Whitewater
>           investigation of President Clinton and Hillary Rodham
>           Clinton. He served about 21 months.
> 
>           Hale was a key witness in the 1996 Whitewater trial of
>           James and Susan McDougal and then-Gov. Jim Guy Tucker.
>           The trial resulted in convictions for the McDougals and
>           Tucker.


-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to