Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Bill: Probably. But he did manage to hit and kill the girl he said rebuffed him. :( Sue > Hi Sue, > > Nothing in any of the stories I read mentioned scopes. Perhaps the > accuracy was more a function of how closely the kids were clustered > together and the shooting was more directional than aimed. > > Bill -- Two rules in life: 1. Don't tell people everything you know. 2. Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Sue Hartigan
- Re: Jonesboro--guns was L&I Jones... Jackie Fellows
- Re: Jonesboro--guns was L&I Jones... Sue Hartigan
- Re: Jonesboro--guns was L&I Jones... Jackie Fellows
- Re: Jonesboro--guns was L&I Jones... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, B... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, But Not Impossible Viola Provenzano
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, But Not Impos... Jackie Fellows
- Re: L&I Jones Appeal Difficult, But Not I... Sue Hartigan
- Re: Attachment Disorder was L&I Jones... Jackie Fellows
- Re: Attachment Disorder was L&I J... Sue Hartigan
- Re: Attachment Disorder was L&I J... Jackie Fellows
- Re: Attachment Disorder was L&I J... Sue Hartigan
- L&I Re: Attachment Disorder was Jackie Fellows
