"Mike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Folks,
I want to thank all of you for the opportunity to participate in this
thread, especially Kathy. I'm a wee bit out of my element here as far as
law issues goes, so I'm going to unsubscribe, but I wanted to make sure
that you folk were aware that I was pleased with being able to discuss the
Noe case with you.
Kathy wrote:
-------
> The one thing everyone should remember is though the links given are
> quite interesting, not everyone has web access so they can't read the
<snip>
-------
Ouch... I keep forgetting that, thanks for the reminder, Kathy.
-------
<snip>
> confessed and why people should forget about the confession, it seems
> some here have decided to forget the confession.
-------
I hadn't forgotten about Marie's confession, but I kept in mind that mito
folk can become quite paranoid and delusional from the deterioration of the
brain. A confession would not have been out of line in this light, and
quite understandable.
-------
> IMHO to use her case and circumstances as a possible way of enlightening
> people to mitochondria is not a example I personally would do,
<snip>
-------
If I gave the impression that this was my goal, Kathy, I humbly apologize.
While I realized that there would be some exposure in the course of getting
involved with the Noe case, it was never my intention of using my
involvement to bring public attention to mitochondrial disorders (or Dr.
Naviaux's either, I would hope.)
If no one minds, I'll stay subscribed until tonight, and unsubscribe after
9:00 PM EST (US), just in case someone would like to respond to this post.
Thanks for allowing me in, and for sharing your views. :-)
TTFN
Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
