Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


Judges Get More Power in Drug Cases

>           WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court today gave federal
>           judges greater power to impose longer terms behind bars
>           for some convicted drug traffickers, unanimously
>           upholding the prison sentences given to five Illinois
>           men.
> 
>           Writing for the court, Justice Stephen G. Breyer said
>           it does not matter that a federal jury did not make
>           clear whether it found the men guilty of conspiring to
>           distribute cocaine in its powder or ``crack'' form. The
>           sentencing judge was free, Breyer said, to sentence the
>           men as if they had been convicted of dealing in both
>           illegal drugs.
> 
>           Under federal sentencing guidelines, the punishment for
>           crack-related crimes is much tougher than crimes linked
>           to powder cocaine.
> 
>           Vincent Edwards, Reynolds Wintersmith, Horace Joiner,
>           Karl Fort and Joseph Tidwell were convicted in 1993 for
>           their participation in a drug-selling conspiracy based
>           in Rockford, Ill.
> 
>           The trial judge told jurors they could convict the men
>           of violating a federal drug-conspiracy law if
>           prosecutors proved they were involved with measurable
>           amounts of powdered cocaine ``or'' crack cocaine.
> 
>           After the jury found the men guilty of participating in
>           an illegal conspiracy, the judge sentenced them based
>           on his finding that the illegal conduct had involved
>           both cocaine and crack.
> 
>           Fort and Wintersmith were sentenced to life in prison.
>           The other three received prison sentences ranging from
>           10 to 26 years, and a federal appeals court upheld all
>           five sentences.
> 
>           All five men appealed, contending that they were
>           entitled to shorter sentences or even a new sentencing
>           proceeding. But today's ruling rejected those
>           arguments.
> 
>           ``The judge was authorized to determine for sentencing
>           purposes whether crack, as well as cocaine, was
>           involved,'' Breyer said, adding that the jury's belief
>           about which drugs were involved was beside the point.
> 
>           The case is Edwards vs. U.S., 96-8732.


-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to