Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


WASHINGTON, April 29 (UPI) _ The FBI says it is looking into whether any
U.S. laws may have
been broken by a man charged with trying to extort 10 million pounds
($16.7 million) from
Mohammed Al Fayed, the father of Dodi Al Fayed and owner of Harrods in
London. 

The man, who has been arrested in Vienna, Austria, allegedly claimed to
have evidence that Dodi
and Diana, Princess of Wales, were murdered. 

The ``evidence'' was alleged to have been documents showing British
intelligence had asked the
CIA help to murder Diana. The princess and Dodi Al Fayed were killed in
a Paris traffic accident
last August. 

Meanwhile, the CIA released a statement today saying, ``Any assertion
that the CIA played any
role in the death of the Princess of Wales is absurd.'' 

A spokeswoman for the FBI field office in Washington confirmed the U. S.
investigation but
declined to give further details, such as whether the probe is limited
to the suspect in custody or
includes alleged accomplices. 

The spokeswoman, Elisa Martin, did issue a statement saying: ``The FBI
assisted the Austrian
police in the investigation of the alleged extortion of Mr. Al Fayed by
an individual who claimed to
have information concerning the death of Mr. Al Fayed's son Dodi and
Princess Diana. The U.S.
Department of Justice is reviewing the case in an effort to determine if
a violation of U.S. laws may
have occurred in this matter.'' 

An Austrian report in the newspaper Kurier said the suspect in the case,
68-year-old George
Mearah, allegedly accepted 1,500 pounds ($2, 500) to attend a meeting
with Al Fayed and
Harrod's security official John Macnamara in Vienna. 

Al Fayed had notified Austrian police and the FBI when first contacted
by the man, and Austrian
police arrested Mearah after monitoring the meeting. He appeared before
a magistrate in Vienna last
week. 
-- 
Two rules in life:

1.  Don't tell people everything you know.
2.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to