"Dr.L.D.Misek-Falkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Sue - you are very nice to do this, but I am not much after this case
except in regard to computer files as evidence. The other night they
broadcast a snippet: the daughter was indeed found to be guilty. It's
curious why I did not see the verdict on Courttv, but other than that I
would vote to save your energies for future hot topics, (unless of
course something turns up on the evidence matter) -- come to think of
it, maybe we can find something on computers and evidence, out there on
the sprawling web. have a good 'un! :) LDMF.
------------------Sue Hartigan wrote:--------------------------------
>
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Dr. L.:
>
> I'm still on the trail of Bray and Ayers. LOL I don't know if I am
> going to be able to find what you want, but it certainly won't be for a
> lack of trying.
>
> Sue
> >
> > :) Hi Kathy - please keep the summaries coming as time permits, I think
> > it must be quite a job, but they're great to read especially for those
> > of us who aren't really keeping up on all fronts. If you do have a
> > summary of 'California v. Bray and Ayers' and its not too much trouble
> > it would be interesting; I doubt tho that they talked about the
> > computer/evidence problem, but who knows... :) LDMF
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
