Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Clinton said Monday he was "mystified
and disappointed"
by sex allegations made against him by Kathleen Willey and stood by his
statement that their White
House encounter was innocent. 

"Nothing improper happened," Clinton said, noting he had already denied
making a sexual advance
toward Willey, a former political loyalist who had worked first as a
volunteer and then as a
part-time employee at the White House. 

"I am mystified and disappointed by this turn of events," he told
reporters during an appearance at a
high school in suburban Maryland. 

White House officials launched a public relations offensive to deal with
allegations made publicly by
Willey, who said in an interview broadcast Sunday that during an
encounter in November, 1993
Clinton groped her after she asked for his help in finding a job. 

White House Press Secretary Mike McCurry said Clinton did not watch the
CBS "60 Minutes"
program, which attracted millions of viewers. "He doesn't need to ... He
was there and he knows
what the truth is," he said. 

Clinton has admitted meeting Willey in the Oval Office and in his
private study near it, but insists his
actions were misunderstood. He acknowledged hugging her, but contended
he was merely trying to
comfort a woman distraught over her husband's financial crisis. 

McCurry refused to accuse Willey of lying in her account, but said: "You
have two witnesses in
conflict." 

The sexual scandal engulfing the White House stems from a sexual
harassment lawsuit filed by
former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones. 

As part of Jones' effort, her lawyers obtained sworn statements from
other women regarding alleged
sexual advances by Clinton -- including Willey and former White House
intern Monica Lewinsky. 

The Willey interview weighed heavily on the minds of White House
staffers Monday, returning some
of them to the gloom that hovered over 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue when
allegations involving
Lewinsky first surfaced in January. In this case, however, Willey said
advances made by Clinton
were unwelcome. 

According to one White House official, Willey "is a well-spoken person
who definitely put a
different face on this than Paula Jones, but at the end of the day, are
there more than two people
who know what happened? I don't see how it changes anything." 

A former senior White House official, assessing the latest development,
acknowledged that "this one
is more disturbing and more difficult than any of the other ones." 

"It's clearly more disturbing than Monica Lewinsky," the former official
said. "Willey is a mature
woman and if she's telling the truth, it's an abuse of friendship and
it's also predatory. It's clearly
taking advantage of a situation." 

In a sign that the latest accusation may be politically damaging for
Clinton, Patricia Ireland, the head
of the National Organization for Women, offered her most blistering
assessment of the president
since the scandal accusations surfaced in recent months. 

"This is beyond the idea of the likable rogue or the womanizer and
really on in to sexual assault,
sexual abuse," Ireland said. 

"It's not verbal harassment, this was an unwanted touching, and I think
that's a very serious
allegation against the president along with the allegations of covering
that up," she said on the NBC
"Today" program. 

Willey's husband, apparently distraught because of legal and financial
problems, committed suicide
in their hometown of Richmond, Va. the day Willey met with Clinton,
although neither of them was
aware of it at the time. 

In pretrial testimony in the Jones lawsuit, which goes to trial May 27,
Clinton said he remembered
hugging Willey and may have kissed her on the forehead in an effort to
console her, but insisted
"there was nothing sexual about it." 

Asked by one of Jones's lawyers whether he put Willey's hand on his
penis, the president said: "I
emphatically deny it. It did not happen." 

Willey last week testified before a grand jury investigating allegations
that Clinton tried to cover up
business, legal and personal indiscretions by seeking to alter the
testimony of people who could
damage him.

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to