[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Doc,
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Honestly, sometimes I think you guys deserve each other! It makes me want to
>say, "All three of you, go to your room!" or something.
>
>The cancer "cure" is neither a cure nor a hoax. It is simply news of a new
>drug that has worked in one species and may work in another.
No it's not. A huge hype of old news is not "simply news." When the stock
of a small very speculative developer of the drug goes up like a roman
candle on the news and even drags a blue chip like Bristol-Meyer in its
wake, when a sensational weekend story in the "NY Times" about a long-term
r&d program becomes breaking news that creates television specials, this
ain't "simply news."
>Testing of that
>"may" will not take place for awhile. That's all there is to that.
>
>Now, can we get back to facts and stop fiddling with personalities, please?
>
>Doc (who's much too old to waste time on flame wars)
You mean you won't help decide who is the biggest liar? Maybe I can help
you out. :-}
I spent over 20 years in R&D. I think I know something about hype of
technology. If Mac and Bill think I am lying again so be it. That was
actually my job.
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
