DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
In a message dated 98-05-05 13:58:15 EDT, you write:
<< Some feminists think that the double standard is really at work here. Many
insurance companies are paying for Viagra, but some of the same companies
still refuse to pay for contraception. I personally think that it is the
anti-choice people that keep insurance companies from paying for
contraceptives, as many incorrectly consider these to be abortifacients.
Ron >>
Personally I'd rather have them pay for contraceptives and even for RU-486 if
that is indicated. The long term costs of unwanted children are going to be
paid for one way or another, aren't they?
Doc
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
