[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Terry:
>
>I think I already posted that one. I'm just gathering information to
>see if this is for real or not, because I do have a vested interest in
>finding out. :) I do appreciate your help.
>
>Sue
Hi Sue,
I guess you would have revealed your interest if you had wanted to. I hope
you aren't talking about having cancer yourself. I have talked to many
people with cancer about the amazing progress that has been made and the
many people who are surviving apparently cancer-free today that would have
simply died years ago.
One of my sisters was given a 40% chance of survival of throat cancer some
eight years ago. That was probably most optimistic but she never read the
playbook. She was lucky to have looked elsewhere when she was told that she
would lose her ability to speak.
Even people with disseminated cancers have responded to some treatment.
But a drug that kills cancer in mice is hardly reason for wild optimism. It
is little more meaningful than the drugs that kill in testtubes.
It seems to me the first thing to tell people with cancer is the truth.
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
