"dr. ldmf [ph.d, j.d.]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Greetings all - Kathy has kindly shared this link to an Opinion which explores consitutional, 4th amendment issues (whether search and seizure was, in context, legal and admissible) in a case involving pornography, disk files of 'gif' (graphic) images, etc.. The court found (against defendant's contentions and motion to suppress) that, inter alia, the 17- page warrant was sufficient in its particularity as to what was seized (computer equipment and paraphanelia), where it was sized, and under what conditions (using a pornographer profile etc). Thanks Kathy for sharing this! :) LDMF. (Check this out and post, if I err... ) PS: this is an interesting case in that we have I think previously discussed warantless-searches; here, even with a 17-page detailed warrant, defendant moved - unsucessfully it turns out - for suppression for putative insufficinecy of the warrant. Well, ya gotta go for it! :) http://www.ljx.com/topdecision/de031798.html Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
