moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Evenin,
If Clinton's sexual past is fair game in showing a pattern of behavior in the case
of Jones v. Clinton and Jones claims she now has a "sexual aversion" despite having
sex anyway then why cannot her sexual history be used to refute her claim?
...Mac
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory moonshine
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory hallinan
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory hallinan
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory DocCec
- Re: L&I Sexual History/Herstory William J. Foristal
