On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 10:50:42PM -0300, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> I'd migrate to something like how the fpc website works (don't know > exactly how it works) because that system seams to work very well > there. Just templates, a FPC program that combines the templates and some scripts to operate them (unfortunately some of them being in TCL, since that's Daniel's pet). > Better then the lazarus website. I don't think it's a big wheel > reinvention. Just a lot of ctrl+c / ctrl+v > > Not to mention the old plan of merging the websites: > http://wiki.freepascal.org/Merging_Lazarus_and_FPC#Website > > A CMS centralizes work at the administrator, and I'm thus we get > dependent on a administrator. Having just code makes it easy for > anyone to fix the website. Moreover, the PHP tools turn out to be not exactly maintenance friendly. Any webcrawler can bring the site down, and keep in mind that Lazarus/FPC sites must be Slashdot/Heise proof. What do you think will happen when Lazarus 1.0 makes slashdot? _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
