> Yes. And we need markers for live templates. For example some green blocks and > some red blocks. > The HighlightAll markers can be used for identifier references too. > Not sure what you refer too.
But it will probably work. Not necessarily with the highlight all (which is search based). But it should be easy once I have an SynEditTextMarkup object. The idea is that it provides functions like MarkupStyleAndColorAtPos( XPosInLine ) : SomeStyleInfo; XPosOfNextMarkupChange( CurrentXPosInLine ) : integer; Then while adding a token, to the token akku, it would be splitted (if needed) and the markup applied. => so any other (non Language (eg non-pascal, non-html,...)) Markup, could be done in there. I'll post more, once I converted my current proto-type, to support this. BestRegards Martin Mattias Gärtner wrote: > Zitat von Martin Friebe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > >> Makes sense,or well depends on how old the plans are, and how much >> SynEdit has moved since. >> One block, that is of particular interest to me is the PaintLines. >> >> PaintLines happens to be an IFDEF SYNLAZ over several 100 (or 1000?) >> lines. A complete Lazarus, and a complete Original version. >> IMHO an IfDef of this Size IMHO doesn't serve the protection/diff >> purpose very much? >> > > There were so many IFDEFs in that part that it was hardly readable. It > reached a > critical limit. > > > >> I have a patch/prototype (still some cleanup on it) for a "highlight >> All" during search feature. >> > > Cool. > > >> Marc Weustink has a copy of this (because I >> had previously send other patches to him). >> This will however require some changes to PaintToken. >> Also PaintToken appears to have several other shortcomings/bugs, which >> could easily be fixed/ >> => but all of those would probably end up in a rewrite of PaintToken >> (which is why I haven't reported those issues yet) >> > > No problem. PaintToken is an optimized function. And like most optimized > functions: When adding new features, you have to rewrite it. > > > >> Any feedback guiding me in this issue would be welcome. >> I can also (in the evening) mail my prototype and comments about it => >> but I don't know what/if Marc has any plans on it. >> >> Another idea (and so far not beyond the state of an idea) is to move all >> TextMarking (HighlightBrackets, SpecialLines, SelectedBlock, and the new >> HighlightAll => features that are not SynEditHighlighter), into a new >> class SynEditTextMarkup. However "PaintLines" still would need changes. >> > > Yes. And we need markers for live templates. For example some green blocks and > some red blocks. > The HighlightAll markers can be used for identifier references too. > > Mattias > > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
