I agree that it is definitely a good attribute to have. It's just a little bit irritating at the moment. But it will all be ironed out if 0.9.26 ships. Then we can just say, Upgrade! :-)
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Mattias Gärtner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Zitat von Reenen Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I've found the LCL Version thing too... And it frustrates me... Because > I > > have one PC I have SVN on, and one old 0.9.24 version. If I want to edit > a > > project after I've worked on the SVN, I've got to reopen all my .lfm's > and > > remove it. > > See here: > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_0.9.26_release_notes#LCL_major_changes > > There are some tipps how to use newer forms on old IDE's. > > > Can we make that it doesn't add it to EXISTING forms, and only add it to > new > > forms? > > No. Because: > It can only be omitted if no component class was used on the form, that > added/renamed/deleted/changed its published properties between your old IDE > version and your new IDE version. But to find this out, you need the > version > number, which is contradictory. > > I know that the LCLVersion creates a break for something that it wants to > fix. > But for all future versions 0.9.26,28,... it will help to reduce the > problems of > changed properties. > > > Mattias > > _______________________________________________ > Lazarus mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus > -- o__ ,_.>/ _ (_)_\(_)_______ ...speed is good _______________ I believe five out of four people have a problem with fractions.
_______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
