Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Lee Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Thank you. I'll give it a try though I think at this point, I'll probably >> stick >> with powtils since I've not had any problems with it in the past even though >> it >> seems to be un-maintained at this point. I'll keep a copy myself and >> maintain >> it for my personal use. > > I'm still using powtils 1.6.0.2 for some of our larger CGI projects. > It works perfectly. > > As for the un-maintained bit. I have read somewhere that Lars (z505) > is quite swamped with paying work (job contracts) at the moment, so > powtils is on the back burner for a while. I go through phases like > that with fpGUI as well, so I wouldn't be to concerned - plus you have > the source code anyway. :-) >
Yep, having the source is a good thing :) That's good news about Lars. >> I'll try the fbweb/lazweb stuff still however as I am curious to get it >> working :) > > Same here, I'm curious to try fbweb, I'm just not that fond of lazweb > pulling in LCL. LCL doesn't belong in a CGI (basically console) > application! Also it doubled the size of the CGI application. Yes I > tried with SmartLinking and Strip. I simply removed the design time > webmodule support (you just assign event handlers anyway with it), > which then removed the LCL dependency and everything still worked fine > - and I have a *much* smaller CGI executable without GUI requirements. > Personally, I could do without the TDataModule descendant and just construct everything in code. After working with tiOPF for a while now, I forgot what a datamodule looks like ;) -- Warm Regards, Lee _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
