On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 22:05 +0100, Lord Satan wrote: > On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:49:43 +0000 > David W Noon <david.w.n...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > > If it's only half as good a Qt's layout classes it will be very good > > indeed. > Did you ever do a 'more complex' GUI with Qt? I am working with Qt in my job > and I would gladly trade Qt's layouts for Lazarus' anchoring and friends? > It takes ages to align Qt's layouts and spacers in a way that they work at > least a little bit like you wish. The Qt-Designer is more hindering than > helping and very often I have more space between my GUI elements than I want > to have. > Perhaps me and my colleagues are just too stupid to use Qt, but our GUI > design is most of the time 'just good enough' and not like we imagined to do > it. > Sorry for ranting, but I can't let a chance to bash Qt's layouts just pass.
I do the coding by hand for Qt layouts and wxWidgets sizers. It's far easier that way. What you are ultimately saying is that Lazarus's form designer is easier to use than Qt designer. I won't dispute that. -- Regards, Dave [RLU #314465] ======================================================================= david.w.n...@ntlworld.com (David W Noon) ======================================================================= _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
