On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho wrote:
> 2009/2/16 Vincent Snijders <[email protected]>: > > I have a feeling something got lost in the translation from Portuguese > > to English or from English to Dutch in the next paragraph, because I > > don't understand your point. > > Basically he said he was very disappointed by the Linux Lazarus 0.9.26 > > He probably installed the Gtk 1. Yes, gtk 1 does look like crap. But > it's very near it's grave now. Well, To old-time linux/unix users such as myself, it does not "look like crap". GTK 1 was revolutionary in its days. The GTK1 target is maybe not the most flashy one by current standards, but it does its job, requires WAY less resources than GTK 2 and is a hell of a lot faster. For this reason I still use it daily. > Gtk 2 is already the standard, so 0.9.28 should have a much better default > look. > > And the possibility of using Lazarus in Linux with LGPL-Qt 4.5 will > give a huge jump in quality. Why is that ? Is Qt so much better than GTK ? Michael. _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
