Graeme Geldenhuys wrote: > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:32 AM, Graeme Geldenhuys > <graemeg.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2009/3/28 Bogusław Brandys <bran...@o2.pl>: >>> What is unique in log4delphi compared to multilog package ? >> And how does both of these differ to the built-in logging support from >> tiOPF? I went to the log4delphi sourceforge website. It seems it's >> usage and features are very similar to tiOPF's logging support, but it >> still seems that tiOPF has more features and options. > > Saying that, 'multilog' package seems very impressive, but the 3rd > party component dependencies seem a bit high. Even so, I might steal > some ideas from the core code and implement them in tiOPF's logging. > :-) > > Regards, > - Graeme - >
How about adding abstract class support from tiOPF to multilog ? That way multilog will drop a check on initialization of logging functons. Am I correct ? I always thought it was a nice tiOPF logging facility. Regards Boguslaw _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lazarus.freepascal.org http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
