On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 16:32:37 -0300 "Marcos Douglas B. Santos via Lazarus" <[email protected]> wrote:
>[...]Its developers should not named their files considering that > these names could be used in a bigger context. Don't you agree? IMO reusable code should be named properly for a bigger context. > IMHO, would be better if packages may have just some "exported units". > What do you think? If you mean Lazarus packages: FPC has only one type of unit, so Lazarus can't mark units private. Of course you can write a library. Then all unit names are hidden. But then you loose a lot of comfort. You might want to help FPC with namespaces. Mattias -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
