On Wed, Oct 20, 2021 at 11:00 AM José Mejuto via lazarus <lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org> wrote:
> There are IMHO two front lines, one is the "replace" of TMask in > internal LCL functions, exposed or not to the user, and in this case all > options that allow mimic the old behaviour should be disabled. The other > one is the TMask itself which can be "replaced" with same settings as > internal LCL functions and/or a TMaskExtended which can use all the > syntax options. I'm sorry, but I don't really know what you mean here. > > Lots of documentation to do. > > In the mask world I think that many mask samples are better than a lot > of text trying to explain what a set, a range, etc, is. Short text with > 3, 4, ... 10 samples. I agree. > but current TMask allows ranges and > sets which is confusing me about the function requirements. Again ,not sure what you mean by that. In the old TMask I introduced the option to disable that and called it moDisableSets (I'm also not native English), where your use of the word Range might have beeen more appropriate. In Pascal a set (of characters) is ['a'..'z'], whic is a synatx TMask does not support AFAICS. -- Bart -- _______________________________________________ lazarus mailing list lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
