Op maandag 08-06-2009 om 12:13 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme Geldenhuys: > Joost van der Sluis wrote: > > > > That's all fine, but imho the fcl-web design is far more flexible. > > Joost, do you use fcl-web without Lazarus?
Yes, but you need one hack to make that work. I have found a way to solve this properly, but the best way is to do that in TApplication, I have to discuss this with Michael and Mattias first. > I have written a few cgi > application for our company using Powtils. I was thinking of converting > them to fcl-web instead of Powtils (I want to minimize our 3rd party > component dependencies and if things are included with FPC, then the > better). I thought that Powtils also adds some other usefull functions. Fcl-web is pretty basic, I'm not sure if it's (atm) enough for what you want. > > as wel. Next on my list is a native web-server using lnet, so that > > What do you mean by "native web-server"? A stand-alone web server like > Apache, but just very much smaller? I don't know lnet, but have briefly > looked at nYume (extremely small web-server written in Object Pascal, > and supports CGI). We need to deploy our CGI applications as part of a > distance learning product to the general public. We obviously don't want > them to install Apache just to run our application, so thinking of using > something like nYume which gets started just before the distance > learning product is launched in the client's pc. Yes, that is the idea. But in my mind it was not supposed to work in production, but only stand-alone (one user) with your application compiled-in. Just for debugging. But with some more effort, it could me made in such a way that it can be deployed with support for multiple users. Joost. -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
