Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb: > Florian, you are not helping your case. ;-) Pointing out more and more > issues in SubVersion.
In which regard? cvs had a poor eol handling which caused a lot of trouble. svn fixes this. However, when converting, the missing eol info had been added by the conversion script but it was missed at certain points and these omissions still pop up. > Marc Weustink wrote: >> Since you are creating a problem which doesn't exist (for years) for the >> laz developers I don't think that will happen. > > Considering that many projects are flocking away from SubVersion to > something better like Git or Mercurial, If git is better you shouldn't have any trouble with line feeding. > it might become a problem in the > future. You guys already proved that that is possible, after all, you > guys already moved from CVS to SubVersion. Indeed, cvs was a pain and svn fixed most of the problems as well as adding some usefull stuff and being a superset of cvs. git misses several stuff compared with svn: proper eol handling, blocking of patches from merging, good support of non unix platforms, ... -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
