Op donderdag 11-06-2009 om 12:39 uur [tijdzone +0200], schreef Graeme Geldenhuys: > Marc Weustink wrote: > > > > Since you are creating a problem which doesn't exist (for years) for the > > laz developers I don't think that will happen.
> I'm simply using my repository of choice (due to better features), but I > would also like to continue contributing to the Lazarus project. Such > unnecessary issues make it a lot harder for contributors or for the > people that need to commit my (and maybe others) patches. Then you have to invest time in our toolchain. I wanted to submit to gdb-archer, and they use git. So I had to set up git. What do you think: should I spam their mailinglist that they should use subversion instead? The first days I spent searching for a bug, was it a Git-problem. . . I was very mad, you may know that. But it's my own problem. They choose git, not I. (I think they won't use it again, though.) All the branches are bringing more problems then solutions. But they are a special case, they have to stay as close as the official cvs branch, to avoid a complete fork. In principle one of the situations git could be usefull. But it's far from ideal... Joost -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
