Graeme Geldenhuys schrieb:
Quoted from a Posix Thread tutorial I found on the internet.
http://www.yolinux.com/TUTORIALS/LinuxTutorialPosixThreads.html
"Threads require less overhead than "forking" or spawning a new process
because the system does not initialize a new system virtual memory space
and environment for the process."
IMO it's not a good idea to let the IDE and the compiler share the same
address space. Even if the compiler could reuse the data (files...),
loaded into the IDE memory, the synchronized access can cost much runtime.
So wouldn't it be more efficient to create a new thread for the compiler
instead of a new process?
Since Lazarus already includes an parser, a built-in compiler should be
feasable. But I'm not sure how far the FPC developers will support a
threaded version of the compiler, that would integrate neatly into Lazarus.
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
