Vincent Snijders het geskryf: > > I only want feature requests that stand a reasonable chance to be > implemented before version 3.0 (due after 2025).
And who decides the fate of such feature requests? If you did not notice, I first posted the idea here in the mailing list to be discussed and get a feeling of what other developers think. I made it clear that I do not know how others feel about this feature, but that I thought it would be helpful. I did not want to "pollute" the Mantis tracker with features only I want. Mattias and Michael commented, without explicitly saying: NO THIS IS RUBBISH! So based on their responses, I understood it that others also feel this could be beneficial, but none of use have the time to implement it right this minutes. Hence, the Feature Request in Mantis - so the idea is documented and not forgotten. BTW: This is the first time I hear that Lazarus developers do NOT look at the Feature Request section in Mantis. It's news to me. > You can. But IMHO this one is a bad example of such a feature > request. In your opinion maybe. By like I said, who decides what is good or bad? At least I posted my idea in the mailing list - to be discussed. You might not have noticed, but I do this often before I report features requests or bugs in mantis. > I fear I offend people, if I close this issue with "No change > required", "Won't fix" (it is not true, patches are excepted). Why not simply allow the creator of the feature request or bug report to delete their own reports. Regards, - Graeme - -- fpGUI Toolkit - a cross-platform GUI toolkit using Free Pascal http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
