----- "Juha Manninen" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Ok, it isn't ready then. With Lazarus IDE those problems don't come > up. > > Do those components rely on LCL bindings only, or does it need some > custom > binding code? > I mean, if LCL bindings work perfectly then Orpheus comps would start > to work > automatically?
Yes, all of the non-Windows widgetsets should behave the same with Orpheus. If not, then there's probably some difference or issue in the widgetset. I say "non-Windows" because with win32 you have access to the full Win API, so there are some things that have to be simulated on non-Windows platforms. It's a little odd that with Orpheus, Carbon seems to be the most stable of all the non-Windows widgetsets. I would not expect that since it's the newest of the 4. Another package that reveals some widgetset differences is this one: http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/THtmlPort With THtmlPort, Carbon is actually the most stable, even more stable than Windows. GTK2 doesn't run at all and I didn't even bother to test Qt. You're welcome to see if you can get it to work on Qt though. I'm not sure how good a test the IDE is. That's kind of like saying, "Well, it worked in the lab, why doesn't work in the field?" Thanks. -Phil -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
