I second that - 1.0rc is the best solution. 2009/11/30 zeljko <[email protected]>
> On Monday 30 November 2009 09:33, Florian Klaempfl wrote: > > > So this proves the point that a version number 1.0 wouldn't change > > anything :) It was FPC which broke things apparently being at version > > 2.2.x. > > You're right, but you can say fpc-1.0 is there, we cannot say lazarus-1.0 > is > there, that's a *big* diff (in the heads of many users - especially for > users > which comes from windows). > Personally, I don't care if lazarus is v0.002 currently because it suits my > needs (I'm unix/linux user for all my life - so perfectly understand what > version number means), but for many users "0.9.28.XX beta" doesn't look > nice. > I think that Paul's proposal for 1.0rc instead of 0.9.30 is a good idea. > Even fpc (2.2.X, 2.4.X, 2.5X) have "children's pain" like > http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=13722 etc... > > zeljko > > -- Atenciosamente, Alexsander da Rosa Linux User #113925 "Extremismo na defesa da liberdade não é defeito. Moderação na busca por justiça não é virtude." -- Barry Goldwater
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
