On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 14:50, waldo kitty <[email protected]> wrote: > sorry but what is the code below supposed to be showing??
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 03:49, David Emerson <[email protected]> wrote: >>> at first I overlooked "e+" which is valid for val (string, real) To which i replied: > Alexander Klenin wrote: >> No, it is not: ... and demonstrated that with the code example. -- Alexander S. Klenin -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
